Skeptics are doing what scientists are supposed to do, that is disproving the AGW hypothesis, reminded Tim Ball in a recent WUWT comment [19. September.], when some IPCC members required to launch criminal charges against “climate deniers”. Of course such talking is ridiculous and irresponsible. But can Tim Ball require more serious behavior? Are skeptics so much better? Not when it comes to clear scientific terminology, as they use the same nonsense climate terms as the promoters of ‘official’ climate. Tim Ball is no exception (see here). Neither CLIMATE nor WEATHER is defined in a manner that servers discussion and understanding our water planet. That supports a “Climate Science turned Monster”, and skeptics inability to stop this trend. They could by requiring precise and clear terminology, which meet academic standards.

WUWT 09 September 2015 http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/28/generalization-specialization-and-climatology/

Dr. Tim Ball on: http://oceansgovernclimate.com/dr-tim-ball-on-generalization-specialization-and-climatology-does-it-mean-he-explains-what-climate-is/